Holding On: Notes on Mapping Resistance from the Margins
Resistance. The word rolls off the tongue as if it were
obvious — to stand back, to oppose, to hold back the force of another. The
Oxford English Dictionary, as of 1939, defines it neatly: ‘organized covert
opposition to an occupying or ruling power.’ Latin roots — resistere:
to stand back. Old French — résister: to stop.
But lately, I find myself wondering what these old roots
might hide, and what they might keep us from seeing.
Because in the places I care about — the Global South, communities at the edges
of empires, women whose names slip through official records — resistance is
rarely so easily organized or so comfortably covert. Sometimes it is loud.
Sometimes it is gentle, so quiet that even the powerful don’t hear it for what
it is. Sometimes it isn’t recognized as resistance at all.
I am only at the earliest, most tentative edge of this
question, and yet it feels like a question that has lived in my bones for a
long time: What does it mean to resist — really? And how does this meaning
shift if we look at it through the eyes of the ones who have survived, endured,
and outlasted so many maps of power?
When I first began studying resistance, I turned to the
familiar theorists: James Scott’s Weapons of the Weak, the sly power of
foot-dragging, gossip, and sabotage — everyday defiance that hides in plain
sight. Michel Foucault’s haunting reminder that power and resistance are locked
in an endless dance. And Hollander and Einwohner’s careful matrix, breaking resistance
down into intention and recognition: Is it deliberate? Do the powerful see it
as defiance? Does it count if no one notices?
It is a useful map. But lately, I feel the limits pressing
in.
Because in the communities I have known — and those I hope
to listen to more deeply — resistance does not always look like opposition.
Sometimes it looks like persistence. Like the refusal to be broken, even when
the world demands your silence. Like cooking the old recipes in secret, singing
the forbidden songs, remembering the names that empire tried to erase. Like
imagining a future your oppressors insist is impossible.
These days, I find my thoughts returning to scholars who
remind us that the Global South holds other ways of knowing what resistance is
and can be. Saba Mahmood, for instance, asks us to sit with the discomfort that
not all agency is oppositional — that women’s religious practices in Egypt, so
often dismissed by liberal Western feminists, might be forms of ethical
self-cultivation that refuse to fit the mold of “liberation” scripted
elsewhere.
Aníbal Quijano and Walter Mignolo, writing from Latin
America, talk of epistemic disobedience — not just saying “no” to
colonial power, but living as if its categories do not have the final word.
María Lugones writes of world-traveling: the possibility of living in
multiple worlds at once, refusing to be pinned down by any one dominant
narrative. And Linda Tuhiwai Smith insists that even the simple act of
researching, of telling our own stories, can be resistance when it revives ways
of knowing that genocide and epistemicide tried to wipe away.
If the dictionary tells us resistance is to hold back —
maybe what the Global South teaches is that it is also to hold on. To each
other. To the land. To languages, memories, kinship, and ways of being that
empire would rather see forgotten.
It is too soon to say what shape my book will take. For now,
I am in that beautifully unsettling place where the questions outnumber the
answers. I know only that I want this project to listen carefully — to the
small and large ways people resist not just through protest and revolution, but
through stubborn living, quiet refusal, and the constant work of building other
worlds in the cracks of this one.
So here I am: tracing maps of resistance while knowing they
will never be complete. Watching how the lines shift when we look through the
eyes of those who have always known how to survive unrecognized. Asking what it
means to “oppose” when opposition alone is not enough — when sometimes,
resistance is not standing back but standing with.
This is just a note from the margins, where my thinking
begins. An invitation, perhaps — for those who carry stories of resistance that
do not fit in the textbooks. For those whose survival has always been misread
or overlooked. For those who have spent lifetimes holding on when the
world told them to let go.
May this humble beginning grow into a book that holds space
for all the ways we resist, remember, and remain.



Comments
Post a Comment